A dying Batman says goodbye in Detective Comics No. 853, the conclusion of Neil Gaiman’s two-part Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader?
Image courtesy DC Comics
Acclaimed writer Neil Gaiman says Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader? is his "love letter to Batman."
Photo: Sophia Quach
Acclaimed writer Neil Gaiman is burying Batman, but not before he pens a final "love letter" to the Dark Knight.
Gaiman, picked by DC Comics to handle Batman’s final appearance in the publisher’s long-running monthly Detective Comics, almost didn’t take the gig. But his high regard for the 70-year-old superhero made this an opportunity he couldn’t skip.
"I found myself saying things like, ‘I don’t have time’ and ‘I have
sworn to never write mainstream comics again,’" the 48-year-old
literary titan told Wired.com by phone from his Addams Family-style residence in Minneapolis. "But I ended up saying, ‘Of course I’m there!"
The end result — a two-part series called Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader? — began with the February issue of Batman and wraps Wednesday with issue No. 853 of Detective Comics. The story line picks up where Grant Morrison’s execution of the Dark Knight in Batman R.I.P. left off.
Gaiman’s twin finales will be bound in hardcover and released this
July. Taken together, they are surreal, hilarious and poignant riffs on
Batman’s back story, told at light-speed by a master storyteller.
Gaiman’s extensive bibliography
is filled with commercially successful comics, novels, prose,
screenplays and more, and is decorated with Hugo, Nebula, Stoker and
Newberry awards. As Hollywood mines comic books and fantasy favorites
for the big screen, Gaiman’s imaginative works seem like a mother lode
for cross-platform hits.
Earlier this year, director Henry Selick’s stunning animated adaptation of Gaiman’s 2002 novella Coraline debuted, grossing $80 million worldwide (and counting). Gaiman hopes to direct a film based on his comic book miniseries Death: The High Cost of Living, a spinoff of his groundbreaking comics series The Sandman.
Wired.com talked with Gaiman about "unfilmable" comics and their sometimes clumsy cinematic adaptations, as well as Coraline, continuity, Sturgeon’s Law, Iron Man and why writing the final issues of Batman and Detective Comics was like consummating a decades-long relationship.
Batman’s enemies look for solace in the passing of their nemesis in Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader? After the two-part Bats finale, the Batman series goes on hiatus for a reboot and Detective Comics leaves the Dark Knight behind to focus on Batwoman.
Image courtesy DC Comics
Wired.com: So how did you become the executor of Batman’s estate, so to speak?
Neil Gaiman: The phone rang about a year ago, and
it was Dan DiDio from DC Comics. He said, "Look we are going to do what
we did to Superman 23 years ago, but with Batman. We are going to end
his monthlies and then reboot and renumber them, so there isn’t going
to be a Batman comic for a while. How would you like to write the last
issue of Batman and Detective Comics in the same way that Alan [Moore] did with the Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?"
It was one of those strange combinations. I though that if I didn’t
do it, someone else would and [they would] mess it up. But also, I
really love Batman. The platonic ideal of Batman, as well as the number
of specific Batmans over the years. I thought it would be really
interesting.
Wired.com: Did you know at the time that the title of the series would so literally resemble Moore’s Superman sendoff and the Silver Age retrospectives that inspired it?
Gaiman: Well, it definitely wasn’t going to be called Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader?
at that point. That was what some people at DC Comics started out
calling it, and eventually it stuck, but the title did take me slightly
by surprise. But I also wrote two homages to Alan’s comic — one at the
beginning and one at the end — but then cut one. I had a line on the
first page where Batman asks if he is dreaming, and a voice says, "No
it’s not a dream and it’s not an imaginary story."
Wired.com: Awesome. That references Alan’s legendary Superman triple entendre: "This is an imaginary story…. Aren’t they all?"
Gaiman: Right. So I cut it, because it was too obvious. Plus, that line is one of the five amazing moments in comics.
Wired.com: That famous preface messes with the idea of
canon and continuity. Moore’s comic is arguably outside DC Comics
continuity, and so arguably is yours. Same goes for a bunch of other
awesome comics. Has continuity outlived its usefulness?
Gaiman: Continuity isn’t actually something that I
ever worry about. You use it where you need to, and you don’t use it
where you don’t need to. It’s a given that we exist in a world where we
have to live in continuity every day; no one is immune to that, in life
or romance novels. By the same token, it’s not something I find
terribly important.
The joy of this Batman story is that there were 70 years of Batman
and I wanted to try and talk about all of it. Alan’s last Superman
story is every bit as readable as it was in 1985, and it doesn’t
actually matter that nobody remembers the Luthor/Brainiac team any
more, or even necessarily remembers the typical Superman trope of
squeezing coal into diamonds. None of that matters, because it is a
glorious story.
Famous friends and mortal nemeses gather to pay their respects to The Dark Knight, and divulge revelations, in Batman No. 686, the first half of Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader?
Image courtesy DC Comics
Wired.com: Batman’s total story is so immense that it seems impossible to make it realistically linear.
Gaiman: What I wanted to do was write the last Batman
story. What should it be? And I wanted to play very, very fair with the
reader. So what I was trying to say is that it honestly doesn’t matter
if it is in or out of continuity. And it doesn’t matter whichever
Batman you love, whether that is Frank Miller’s Dark Knight Returns and Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight, or the Batman TV show
or even the various, glorious animated series. This is the last Batman
story. He’s dead, and this is what’s happening. It’s been 70 years, and
it’s been wonderful, but this is the last one.
Wired.com: It’s a fabulous closure, especially the
part where he says goodbye to all the stuff in the Batcave. "Goodnight
mechanical dinosaur." "Goodnight giant penny." Classic!
Gaiman: [Laughs] It’s all in there. There was
definitely a wonderful joy of writing those last 10 pages of the second
issue. While I was doing it, I was thinking that there are people out
there who will think that I’ve gone mad.
Wired.com: Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader? reunited you with your Marvel 1602 collaborator, artist Andy Kubert.
Gaiman: I kept asking Andy to do things that are
impossible, and because no one told him they were impossible, he did
them. Normally someone asks him to draw three panels, but doesn’t ask
him to draw those three panels in the style of Brian Bolland or Jerry Robinson.
I loved the fact that I could ask Andy for Robin when he’s 17, off to
college and still wearing the costume, the Speedo and everything, which
looks kind of stupid. But I still want it to be moving. And he did it.
Wired.com: I loved what he did with the last panel, where the Bat-Signal turns into something I can only describe as the Star-Child from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Gaiman: Writing that part made me incredibly happy. In a lot of ways, Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader? is a love letter, as was Alan’s Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow? That was his love letter to Julius Schwartz and Mort Weisinger and Curt Swan
and all of the guys who had worked on Superman. And it was a love
letter to the Superman who lived in Alan’s heart, who wasn’t going to
be around anymore. I wanted to write the same love letter to Batman.
Wired.com: Reading Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader? one gets the idea that Batman has lived in your heart for a while.
Neal Adams’ gothic Batman saved the character from going too "twee in the ’60s," says Gaiman.
Image courtesy DC Comics
Gaiman: When I was 5, I was in a car with my dad and he mentioned that there was this Batman TV show
in America about a man who dressed up in a costume and fought crime.
The only bat I ever knew was a cricket bat, so what I thought he looked
like was rather odd, based on that. Months later, the series hit the
U.K., and I remember watching and being affected by it. Really
worrying, genuinely worrying, on a deep primal level, "Will he be OK?"
That is the way it was with every deathtrap. If I missed the end of an
episode, I’d get my friends to tell me he was OK.
Because of the Batman TV show, my dad picked up Smash! comics
for me, which reprinted a Batman cartoon strip, which were much more
about continuity than the television program. Those were my gateway
drugs into Batman. Even when batman went twee in the ’60s, Neal Adams reinvented him as a long-eared, shadowy character. And when I was in my 20s, Frank Miller’s Dark Knight Returns came out and I found myself writing my first piece of academic criticism on it.
I wanted my comic to contain all of that, from the story to the art. I
wanted it to have that love in there. I wanted to write the last Batman
with honor and love.
Wired.com: So, did you pull it off?
Gaiman: Well, since you’ve seen the actual comic,
you’re actually ahead of me. I’ve only seen the PDF! [Laughs] But to
your question, people used talk to me about The Sandman back
when I was writing it, and my answer was that I was too close to it to
know what I was doing and feeling. Decades later, I could look back and
go, "Whoa, we did it!"
I remember George Harrison complaining that he had no idea what The
Beatles meant to the ’60s. So the truth is, I have no idea. I look at
it and say, "Andy did me proud," but I do wonder if they’ll think I
went mad at the end. Whether it works or not, I don’t know or care, but
it makes me very happy. I know that if Batman ever reads it, he will
know that he was my first love.
Wired.com: Right before you buried him?
Read More: WIRED
Via: @luckthelady
Posted by: Andreea Hirica
Posted on: Contagious Ideas
